- Erik On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, S. Hieber wrote:
Just my guess, but they won't be often redecorated -- too messy or irf pots are used they look like a pot rack; they will mostly be new setups or mostly one plant that eventually took over all the space; and they will show slow growing plants -- even DW adds ferts for swords. In fact, the robustness of certain plants would be a "tell" that the fabric of the honor system had been slightly rent. A problem with having lots of categories is that you get fewer entries in each and the contest is not so large that that's a good thing. Otoh, I think it's tough for a soil-underlayment tank *without* added CO2 to compete against CO2 and added fert tanks. So this might be an exception to the problem and actually bring in more entries. sh --- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote:I was just commenting over at APC regarding our/their 2005 contest and came up with some thoughts about soil-based/natural aquascapes. What do you think? My definition of a natural aquarium is one where there is no external supplimentation to un-naturally stimulate growth. Some supplimentation is necessary to maintain plant health dependant on regional water chemistry. ie: Charlotte water is really soft and lacking in minerals so I may have to add a little calcium or something to make up for an essential deficiency. This rules out regular/sustained use of CO2, PMDD, and any commercial plant suppliments. We're already on an honor system, this would just have to be an extention of that. ...I feel it would be good to have a separate category/system for soil-based "natural" or "no-tech" tanks. There are things that one just can't do in a natural tank that are taken for granted in artifically supplimented tanks. Natural tanks also have their own flavor/traits that are separate of "artifical" aquariums. A spectacular natural aquarium, one that is a true achievement of its type, would/could look very different than an artificial tank simply because the metabolic limitations prohibit the excessive grooming that an artificial tank can withstand. I've been putzing around some fish forums and am finding these "Walstad" tanks to be gaining popularity with people. Having a separate grouping for tanks like this could introduce a whole new demographic to the hobby. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest_______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest
-- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest