In the next TAG, I will remove Steve's name as a place to send questions. Then what? Should I say that questions should be put on hold or what? Paul K suggested that the committee be composed of several people who could answer different topics. who will be the point of contact? Bob Day had this comment I think having Q&A is good, I've learned from the answers even >though I might not have thought about it or had the problem. There is a >certain comfort seeing help/suggestions in print along with articles. A >suggestion on that note, the memo box about not having a Q&A position at >the moment - it sounds too final, I think we should continue to request >question submissions (at least to build up a back log) with the >acknowledgement that an anwser may take time: Currently TAG has an empty >position for Q&A articles and can not immediately respond to your >questions, submissions will continue to be accepted and answered as >possible. Not the best wording but I hope you get the point. > Please provide input ASAP, as we are "on deadline." Neil