At 03:27 PM 11/7/98 -0500, Neil Frank wrote: >In the next TAG, I will remove Steve's name as a place to send questions. >Then what? Should I say that questions should be put on hold or what? > >Paul K suggested that the committee be composed of several people who could >answer different topics. who will be the point of contact? > >Bob Day had this comment > I think having Q&A is good, I've learned from the answers even >>though I might not have thought about it or had the problem. There is a >>certain comfort seeing help/suggestions in print along with articles. A >>suggestion on that note, the memo box about not having a Q&A position at >>the moment - it sounds too final, I think we should continue to request >>question submissions (at least to build up a back log) with the >>acknowledgement that an anwser may take time: Currently TAG has an empty >>position for Q&A articles and can not immediately respond to your >>questions, submissions will continue to be accepted and answered as >>possible. Not the best wording but I hope you get the point. >> > >Please provide input ASAP, as we are "on deadline." Hi Neil, I'd like to suggest that we ask Olga Betts. Whether we have her team up with someone else, or do it on her own could be up to her and Paul. She's already working under the Ed. committee, and seems to feel comfortable with Paul. She answers questions lucidly one the APD, and seems to enjoy responding to people. She's got a good handle on managing planted tanks, and uses a pretty balanced approach. Finally, I think she'd really get a kick out of taking over from Steve ;-) Karen