>Diana has asked me to check with the AGA to ask for permission for her to >use a few Q&A's from her "TAG" column in her upcoming book (self published) >with credit given to the AGA. I told her I didn't think it would be a >problem, but would run it by the rest of you. Do you all agree? I will >assume a "yes" answer if you have not responded by Saturday. > >Thanks, > >Karen OK with me (Paul K.) A few other notes: I agree that AGA ought to go quarterly. It would take some pressure off Neil, and we can always do an extra issue if the backlog of unpublished articles gets too large. :-) We need to get more articles. They don't have to be anything fancy or major in import. Many of the experienced growers in AGA could generate articles out of minor observations or notions that occur to them. We may have gotten a little too fancy recently and scared off many hobbyists from submitting. Perhaps more of Neil's editorial work can be farmed off to other people, such as, for example, the author-title lists I did recently for vols. 10 and 11. By the way, were those lists OK? I sent them in and never heard. I am willing to do more work like that, especially in the summer. Lots of publications have long lists of associate editors. Perhaps we could round up a few. If too few people are doing too much work, then we need to think about lessening the workload, perhaps simplifying the publication. Paul Krombholz, in steamy Central Mississippi, having the same weather as most of the central U.S.