Re: Diana Walstad's Book

[krandall@world.std.com]

At 06:50 PM 7/22/99 -0500, Paul wrote:
>A few other notes:
>
>I agree that AGA ought to go quarterly.  It would take some pressure off
>Neil, and we can always do an extra issue if the backlog of unpublished
>articles gets too large.  :-)
>
>We need to get more articles. They don't have to be anything fancy or major
>in import.  Many of the experienced growers in AGA could generate articles
>out of minor observations or notions that occur to them.  We may have
>gotten a little too fancy recently and scared off many hobbyists from
>submitting.
>
>Perhaps more of Neil's editorial work can be farmed off to other people,
>such as, for example, the author-title lists I did recently for vols. 10
>and 11.  By the way, were those lists OK?  I sent them in and never heard.
>I am willing to do more work like that, especially in the summer.  Lots of
>publications have long lists of associate editors.  Perhaps we could round
>up a few.
>
>If too few people are doing too much work, then we need to think about
>lessening the workload, perhaps simplifying the publication.

All good ideas.  Thanks for the input.  It will be a while before Neil gets
to see it, since he left from my house directly to vacation in Miami (where
I bet it's even steamier than central Mississippi<g>)

Karen