Re: PAM

[krandall@world.std.com]

At 10:47 AM 9/15/99 -0400, Merrill Cohen wrote:
>Unless I'm missing something, if we are going to invest money, why not just
>pay like is intended for PAM for AGM and have the one good magazine?  This
>doesn't seem right to me!  What have I missed?

We would be replacing TAG with PAM, Merrill.  IMO, the advantage being that
the work would be being done by a group of people who, for whatever reason,
are willing to go hustle for advertisers and writers to get the job done.
The hope is that we would have an even more attractive magazine than we've
had in the past, though I would hope that the "feel" of the editorial
content would not change too much.

Karen