Re: PAM

[Dave Gomberg <gomberg@wcf.com>]

I pretty much second what Karen said below except that I would like the
scientific level to approach that of Ichthyologica (which SFAS published
when the IRS told them to burn $1M) where the science articles are
concerned.   Of course the beginner and tips articles would be more
hobbyist oriented.

At 07:01 AM 9/16/1999 -0400, krandall@world.std.com wrote:
>At 10:47 AM 9/15/99 -0400, Merrill Cohen wrote:
>>Unless I'm missing something, if we are going to invest money, why not just
>>pay like is intended for PAM for AGM and have the one good magazine?  This
>>doesn't seem right to me!  What have I missed?
>
>We would be replacing TAG with PAM, Merrill.  IMO, the advantage being that
>the work would be being done by a group of people who, for whatever reason,
>are willing to go hustle for advertisers and writers to get the job done.
>The hope is that we would have an even more attractive magazine than we've
>had in the past, though I would hope that the "feel" of the editorial
>content would not change too much.
>
>Karen  
>
>
--
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco            mailto:gomberg@wcf.com
For low cost CO2 systems that work:  http://www.wcf.com/co2iron 
Tropica MasterGrow in the USA:      http://www.wcf.com/tropica 
-----------------------------------------------------------------