Re: PAM, distribution of stock

[Dave Gomberg <gomberg@wcf.com>]

I am sure that if we get all the facts straight, there will be
near-unanimity on what to do.  I may be wrong, but it sure seems like a
bullet-proof winner for AGA to me.  Heck, I deliberately designed it that
way.  

At 06:45 PM 9/25/1999 -0400, krandall@world.std.com wrote:
>At 09:45 AM 9/25/99 -0400, Neil Frank wrote:
>
>>It actually makes me feel a bit uncomfortable to
>>participate in a final vote it anyone thinks that my comments or
>>recommendations are tainted or in anyway biased. If so, I will gladly
>>"recuse" myself. On the other hand, it should not come as a big surprise
>>that I would submit an illustrated article or 2 <g>.
>>
>>  Just for imagining's sake, what
>>>if two years in we had $16K in stock distributed as follows:
>>>
>>> $3K AGA startup purchase
>>> $3K AGA additional purchases over two years
>>> $6K Gomberg
>>> $1K Randall (for pics and articles)
>>> $2K Frank (for editing)
>
>This is true for me as well.  We all know that I write, and I have already
>said I will write for PAM.  But I get paid for my articles wherever I sell
>them.  I'm not looking toward PAM as a way to boost my income.  But as far
>as not voting is concerned, I hope that we _will_ be able to come to a
>concensus, and voting will not be a necessity in any case.
>
>Karen
>
>
--
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco            mailto:gomberg@wcf.com
For low cost CO2 systems that work:  http://www.wcf.com/co2iron 
Tropica MasterGrow in the USA:      http://www.wcf.com/tropica 
-----------------------------------------------------------------