PAM

[Neil Frank <nfrank@mindspring.com>]

Dave, Until AGA and you come to some final agreement, I strongly suggest
that none of us publicly announce the idea of PAM. This is analagous to
yelling fire in a crowded auditorium. Many of our members will freak out.

IMO, our members are entitled to hear the news first hand from the AGA
board and not be confused by potential rumors that AGA or TAG is in
trouble. I would also like to see PAM be presented as an extention or
evolution of TAG. As we have all discussed, TAG will be rolled into PAM
i.e. our current editorial staff will be allowed to prepare the AGA
contributions to PAM... the number of pages still to be determined)

Neil