Bravo, Neil...... Well thought out and said!! I'm an optimist, but I really can't see another plant magazine. The "Aqua Journal" is available for the discerning hobbyist and they are having troubles. The newletter idea is smart. I don't know Dave, and I have nothing against him personally; but realistically, a magazine cannot "fly" for just such a small group of devoted hobbyists -- small in the sense that one thousand devotees means very little for a business venture. That's my position on this matter, FWIW. Merrill On 10/26/99 19:12:46 you wrote: >I agree with David, that simple is best. During all my conversations with >Gomberg, it is still not clear why we want to invest and have control. To >maintain control, we may have to continue to put in more money. The end >benefit? perhaps to make money? is that important to us? Do we have a >long-term need for a fatter treasury to do what we want? >On the other hand, in this venture, our stock control would give us some >control over content. So far the expected content and type of ads seem OK >for me. Might this change? maybe. Can we deside to divorce Gomberg then? >sure. Will our membership follow us or jump ship for gomberg? That all >depends on what AGA has to offer. As I said before, this is an OPPORTUNITY >for AGA to sharpen its focus and give its members a reason to be. > >In conclusion, unless Dave's interest in AGA suggests otherwise, I think it >might be best for AGA to not have any investment.... to have some agreement >with Dave that our membership is ours and that he cannot make any direct >mailings other than the distribution of PAM and that we offer to provide >him input for the 4 or an occasional 8 pages to GIVE HIM an incentive for >our members to accept PAM as one of the AGA vehicles for disseminating its >news. I still think AGA should consider alternate communication vehicles. >We have the AGA web site... and we might want to consider a quarterly or >semiannual newsletter (to come out between issues of PAM). Such a newletter >(2-4 pages) can be used for special announcements (little lead time is >needed) or other member oriented material. many clubs have multiple >publications. > >Note that I deleted all the old text. this keeps the size of the incoming >message as small as possible. Also, if you cc aga0mcm, then you don't have >to cc the individual members, unless you want them to get 2 copies. >--Neil >