[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: [AGA-mcm] Re: Luto Web-Photo Proposal



I don't think Jay needs to a "mock up" or do a pilot, it is just when the convention is here, put the whole thing together.

I think we all think the help is awesome!! It is nice to have people champion different issues. I think if there is any cautiousness here it is because every year several people offer to do things and then drop the ball. It would really suck to alter the website, poke holes into things and then have things not materialize. Jay-I am not questioning you dedication at all, I have only heard excellent things about you for at least over a year, so I think everyone is very happy that you have come on board and want you to stay. Any extra help, ideas and enthusiasm is greatly appreciated. Things just sometimes move slow around the AGA, (and at my job, and my old job etc).

The other issue is that interactive websites have more security issues, so that would be a concern.

No need for Jay to waste his time/effore doing a pilot/or mock up in my opinion, just when we get the convention material, go for it, and then we can work on a format that is acceptable to the AGA.

That is my 2 cents worth.

Take it or leave it,


Kathy


On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, S. Hieber wrote:

If Jay is willing to do th e work of trying to put
something together, I think we should encourage his
efforts.

This does not mean that we necessarily then change the way
anything on the AGA website works. But if Jay comes up with
something that looks useful, great.

At the same time, I would hate for Jay to spend a lot of
time on a project only to to ultimately find insufficient
acceptance from the Board.

So perhaps what could help is for Jay to undertake a pilot
form of developing his ideas. Something less ambitious than
the full project but that would give the MCM something more
tangible to consider. I don't know if a "pilot" version
would actually be nearly as much work as a full blown
version. Perhaps it is only me, but I'm not so much a
Luddite as a nebbish when it comes to "software" ideas and
have trouble imagining how the idea will actually look/work
in practice or what the maintenance issues might be.

Concerning posible substantial changes/additions to the AGA
website in the past, one issue has been, if we add this
piece are we sure that it will be maintained and by whom?

But I really like the interest Jay is showing here and his
willingness to commit his personal resources (talent and
time). I really like the focus on member/patron impact. And
I like pictures too.

And for the longer term, this could mean offloading some of
the tremedous burden that Erik has been carrying for the
AGA website.

sh

--- Jay Luto <jayluto@hotmail.com> wrote:

Erik and AGA Board,

I am gathering that you see a larger purpose to a
general "gallery" than
just the annual convention pictures.  If so, please reply
with particulars,
'cause I think the board was also under the >impression
we were just talking
convention pictures.

My intentions are not to push my luck here but rather
give constructive
feedback. I wasn't suggesting full-blown AGA Forum but
rather invest some
time on little project - Gallery which could turn out to
be important, at
least in my opinion. Newest generation of Aqua Hobbyists
is very sensitive
when it comes to visual effects. I see online Communities
struggling just
because their Graphic User Interface is not user friendly
and lacks
creativity. At the same time the less "messy", the more
professional. I
guess one needs to find that balance. People like to see
pictures, put faces
with names/nicknames, see aquarium setups and good
quality photography work.
Internet is extremely powerful tool and it could become
very successful if
used properly. I'm www.njas.net Webmaster and check
statistics on weekly
basis. There is always a lot more movement around
website, which was
upgraded after my arrival as webmaster, after general
info or fishroom
pictures are uploaded.

What I'm trying to say here is that paper / internet
advertising strategies
are equally important nowadays. The more user friendly,
the better for
website and AGA organization. Convention Gallery is
perfectly fine and above
suggestions are long term ideas !!!

However, I don't see a need for a full-blown
interactive forumish thing at
this point.   I would think that the "convention picture
gallery" be made
entirely with static pages and images at >convention
time?

You finished with question mark. Are you still
considering ?. Please think
about it.

I was told that Erik and Board are usually looking for
detail descriptions
when it comes to new project especially one which has
WebSite as main
subject. I'm not giving up on my ideas, yet. New guy on
the block doesn't
mean new and useless ideas :).

Repetition is a mother of success so I will keep trying.

Regards,
Jay Luto


----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com>
To: "jay luto" <jayluto@hotmail.com>
Cc: <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: Status


Hi Jay,

Here is my thinking:  I think that having a nicer
layout for the
convention pictures is a good thing, and something to
do for this year's
convention pictures.

However, I don't see a need for a full-blown
interactive forumish thing at
this point.   I would think that the "convention
picture gallery" be made
entirely with static pages and images at convention
time?

I am gathering that you see a larger purpose to a
general "gallery" than
just the annual convention pictures.  If so, please
reply with
particulars, 'cause I think the board was also under
the impression we
were just talking convention pictures.

Also, since you're now one of the official "do-ers",
I'd like to offer you
the dubious honor of joining the Advisory Committee
mailing list, where
you'll be forced to hit the delete button more than you
ever wanted, but
will also be able to participate in discussions of this
sort.  You can't
vote, but it's almost as good.

   - Erik

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, jay luto wrote:

Erik,

So what is the status with Gallery ?. Would you be
interested in new,
more
"professional" layout (Gallery Software) or you still
against it :). I
would
strongly recommend one. I know people said in the
past that current
picture
layout is a bit chaotic and this could bring more
traffic to website as
well
as help create more interest in online AGA
shop/books/TAG/membership
etc. If
we work on it now, we could have that implemented
before AGA and create
interest. I know you are busy with AGA preparations
so I wouldn't mind
taking
initiative. Helping even more.

Also, how about sending AGA mass email about Coming
up attraction - new
Gallery. This is not a huge project but it will
created more traffic
around
AGA website and whole organization. In that email you
can also mention
New
Photographer Position and presence at AGA. Some
people are interested in
this
stuff and will definitely spend few minutes browsing
"around the
website"
looking for gallery.

If you guys circulating AGA related emails around the
AGA Board and you
need
some help, scream. I'm here and ready to help out.

Regards,
Jay Luto



_________________________________________________________________
Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news,
plus voter tools
and
more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx


--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com

_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm



=====
Plant your feet in the nation's capital and learn the art of aquascaping Senske 
style.

The Annual AGA Convention, November 12-14, 2004.
Registration *and* Banquet only $98 until October 28.

Convention Details/Registration at aquatic-gardeners.org & gwapa.org
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm

_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm