[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-mcm] AGA2K4 Feedback Summary
- To: AGA Advisory Committee <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] AGA2K4 Feedback Summary
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:03:09 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=31T/NBsWvF7xtgkkftDiG7PR6FzxO3s4laoBJFuyDA3VTGMWRUbqIZUzzsbmHT3nc0xpSycQyJbuV5kB5Yoa3yW+Rxw6RQuYEy/bFgW+8Olhhw684OZRclZzVSJ3RCTBpw1M0niSpALhrJ1ElRl8zCsPkLr5lmeOVlG1kJbOD00= ;
You're right, of course. Maybe we could explain a little
bit more obviously at the start that criticism is intended
as constructive so is pos and neg, blah blah.
sh
--- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Karen Randall wrote:
>
> > I think we all understand the "rush" part, and the
> reasons behind it. But
> > I'm surprised that people thought the comments were
> excessively negative.
> > I'd like to hear what some of you thought. I thought
> we tried to give
> > constructive criticizm. I know I was not the only one
> who mentioned several
> > times that a case could be made for many of the tanks
> being "the winner".
> > But if you don't get nit-picky, there is no way to
> justify picking one tank
> > over another.
>
> I thought we were able to emphasize what judges LIKED
> about their
> particular favorites this year, as they were all there in
> person. In
> previous years, I've had to rely on replaying back
> comments from absent
> judges, and they weren't necessarily on the aquascapes
> they liked in
> particular. I'll have to listen to it all again & see
> how it plays from
> the other side of the podium.
>
> But I think the whole "negativeness" is perpetual and
> also unavoidable.
> The #1 tank in some gategories WERE tanks that none of
> the judges really
> liked best. So there will be some negative comments.
> Either we don't say
> anything at all, or there's going to be some negativity.
> Maybe I needed
> to say that at the beginning. Oh well.
>
> PS: Those people who saw the thing in person may have
> complaints about me
> rushing on ahead, but those who only see the DVD will
> have no such
> complaints. Just as I edited out all of Diana's
> accidental backups on
> her slides, I will be editing out all of my accidental
> move-aheads.
>
> - Erik
>
> --
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm