I also was fine with the proposal done by Scott, other than the few already mentioned minor typo and formatting problems. I thought it was comprehensive and very well done. Now that I am back in town I will read Cheryl's version and make any additional comments if needed. Larry --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > FWIW, I was fine with the proposal Scott sent (sans > a few typos). Haven't > had time to check Cheryl's edits yet, but I'm OK > sending them what we have > if it'll help move things along! > > - Erik > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Phil Edwards wrote: > > > Yes they are. Tom told me that they're waiting > for it. > > > >> From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> > >> Reply-To: AGA Advisory Committee > <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> > >> To: AGA Advisory Committee <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> > >> Subject: [AGA-mcm] Proposal Doc > >> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:47:17 -0800 (PST) > >> > >> Think the California folks are still hungry for a > proposal > >> doc? > >> > >> sh > >> _______________________________________________ > >> AGA-mcm mailing list > >> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AGA-mcm mailing list > > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > -- > Erik Olson > erik at thekrib dot com > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm