Re: [AGA-mcm] Fwd: Re: The so-called "Bid Doc" -- aka the"AGA_Convention_Host_Proposal_Requirements_and_Guidelines_ver_4a"

[Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@rightstuffwebsites.com>]

Erik Olson wrote:

  But, especially after last convention, there's NO way we're
> going to approve anything or anyone without a thorough review.  It's not 
> up to the AGA to pre-appoint anyone or give anyone any kind of 
> guarantees. We can make suggestions, we can talk about what is likely to 
> work, but that's all.

Absolutely. AGA cannot afford to go out on another limb. (PAM was a limb we 
couldn't afford either, in retrospect!) If they can't or won't approach 
this in a business-like manner, we'll have to tell them thanks, but no 
thanks. So much for begging, eh, Scott? :-/

It isn't a question of HIM being sure the event would be a success. WE have 
to be sure.

Cheryl
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm