If printing, I would suppose that most folks aren't going to get the kind of print quality we get from the pro printer even if printing a photograph of a page. So I'd say go 1 to 1, but that's the only reason. I know you have a good eye for transcribed/recoded material. sh --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > To me it's a matter of whether the PDF is meant to be > viewed or printed. > In this archive, it's meant for PRINT only. For viewing, > we've got the > jpegs+html with the nice navigation. > > - Erik > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Larry Lampert wrote: > > > I am no Adobe expert by any means but I would think it > > would be best to have one tag page per PDF page since > > you can change your page view to view 2 or more pages > > at a time in Acrobat. You can also zoom in so you > > could go the other way with a 2 up format, but this > > seems to be most convenient. > > > > Larry > > --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > > > >> I might send out some disks for people to beta-test. > >> Since I'm home with > >> Markus (no daycare on MLK Day), I've got most of the > >> TAGs scanned already! > >> > >> Here's a question: Do you think it would make sense > >> having one "TAG page" > >> per PDF page, or do 2 side-by-side "TAG Pages" for > >> each PDF page? > >> > >> - Erik > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Larry Lampert wrote: > >> > >>> Me too. I want a DVD as soon as they are > >> available! > >>> > >>> Larry > >>> > >>> > >>> --- "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I'm sold. > >>>> sh > >>>> --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I can't think of anything to change! > >>>>> > >>>>> Karen > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>> From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com> > >>>>> To: <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> > >>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 10:35 AM > >>>>> Subject: [AGA-mcm] TAG archive CD/DVD > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Phil Edwards wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ah, I missed the point! I didn't know it was > >> a > >>>> CD > >>>>> until AFTER I posted > >>>>>>> that. It's going to have all the articles on > >>>> the CD, > >>>>> isn't it? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My beanie's not up to speed yet. I'll catch > >> up > >>>> to > >>>>> formation soon....:) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No worries -- it's been quite a while since the > >>>> AGA > >>>>> talked of this > >>>>>> archive. In fact, I beleive that was around > >> the > >>>> time I > >>>>> was calling you on > >>>>>> a cellphone in the middle of the 2002 banquet > >> so > >>>> your > >>>>> local party would > >>>>>> know the aquascaping contest was now open. So > >>>> it > >>>>> probably would have been > >>>>>> worthwhile to recap the proposal to start. > >>>> Here's the > >>>>> "latest", > >>>>>> incorporating yesterday's talk: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. This is a CD-ROM containing > >>>>>> a. the "prehistorical" issues Vol 1-3, never > >>>> available > >>>>> as back issues > >>>>>> b. all of Neil's and Mary's issues, now > >>>> out-of-print > >>>>>> c. my one-shot issue, even though it's still > >>>> for sale > >>>>> (just 'cause > >>>>>> it closes out the black-n-white era) > >>>>>> d. the out-of-print PAM's? [New Idea] > >>>>>> d. Indexes and cross-references for ALL issues > >>>> of TAG > >>>>> and PAM as > >>>>>> of date of release > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2. Technical details on the pages themselves: > >>>> 100 dpi > >>>>> resamples of each > >>>>>> page, saved as reasonably-high quality jpegs, > >>>> with HTML > >>>>> pages surrounding > >>>>>> them for navigation. The pages are NOT turned > >>>> back > >>>>> into text, and thus > >>>>>> not searchable. We're relying on the indexes > >>>> for this. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 3. For issues not included in the archive > >>>> (i.e., > >>>>> everything available for > >>>>>> purchase!), have something on its contents page > >>>> that > >>>>> says "this back-issue > >>>>>> is available for purchase" with a back-link to > >>>> the > >>>>> website. [New Idea] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 4. Also release DVD-ROM version that also > >>>> contains 300 > >>>>> dpi printable PDFs > >>>>>> (but again, based on JPEG images, not on > >>>> original > >>>>> text). [New Idea] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 5. The AGA Website already contains (today!) a > >>>>> significantly scaled-down > >>>>>> version of the archive > >>>>> (www.aquatic-gardeners.org/TAGIndex): > >>>>>> > >>>>>> a. It's integrated into the main website and > >>>>> incorporates its > >>>>>> style sheets, etc > >>>>>> b. No actual articles hosted on the website, > >>>> just > >>>>> indexes, > >>>>>> covers, and tables of contents > >>>>>> c. Website version will be modified to have > >> the > >>>> TOC's > >>>>> report > >>>>>> "This issue is available as part of our > >> back > >>>> issue > >>>>> CD-ROM" > >>>>>> or "This issue is available for individual > >>>>> purchase" with > >>>>>> appropriate linkes [New Idea] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 6. Pricing: I propose $25 for the DVD-ROM and > >>>> $20 for > >>>>> the CD-ROM, > >>>>>> with a $5 hike for non-members or people > >> out > >>>> of the > >>>>> country. CD's > >>>>>> and DVD's are very cheap to ship. > >>>> Domestically, > >>>>> it's about a > >>>>>> buck-o-five (actually buck-o-six, but they > >>>> didn't > >>>>> write a song about > >>>>>> that in Team America). Foreign is > >>>> $2.50-3.50, and > >>>>> I have to go down > >>>>>> to the Post Office. But I kinda like the > >>>> idea of > >>>>> giving the foreign > >>>>>> nonmembers a break and not penalizing them > >>>> twice. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 7. Why it's not going to happen today, and > >>>> might not > >>>>> happen for another > >>>>>> 6-12 months: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> a. Need to rescan TAG v.4-10 as originals lost > >>>> in a > >>>>> hard drive > >>>>>> crash in 2000 before backup. Cheryl just > >>>> mailed me > >>>>> a nicer > >>>>>> set that has the real covers for the first > >>>> year and > >>>>> doesn't > >>>>>> have my home address pasted on the back. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> b. Program mods to implement the new ideas, > >> and > >>>> split > >>>>> out the > >>>>>> author index alphabetically. Also need > >> icon > >>>> for > >>>>> subject index. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> c. baby #2 is due March 1st. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So I guess I'd like to see feedback on the > >>>> modified > >>>>> proposal so it can be > >>>>>> brought to a vote & maybe finished in the next > >>>> month. > >>>>> But if it's a year > >>>>>> from now, at least it's official. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Erik > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Erik Olson > >> > > === message truncated === > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AGA-mcm mailing list > > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > -- > Erik Olson > erik at thekrib dot com > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm