Re: [AGA-mcm] How much more TAG?

["S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>]

It probalby has more impact for those companies printing
tens or hundres od thousands fo copies. So we might not
need to worry about that ;-)

sh
--- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@rightstuffwebsites.com> wrote:
> One reason that we have such heavy paper is because of
> the quality and 
> saturation of photos. With so much ink on the page, it's
> best to have a 
> thicker, more opaque paper to prevent bleeding through.
> 
> This is also something I will explore, although in my
> experience paper 
> thickness has not been where the savings lies.
> 
> Cheryl
> 
> S. Hieber wrote:
> > --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Actually, our internal pages are already heavier stock
> >>than most larger 
> >>format magazines. 
> > 
> > 
> > I meant, if we went full size, I'd like to see heavier
> > stock than most mags use, if I had my 'drathers. I like
> the
> > heftiness of TAG.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-mcm mailing list
> > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> 
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm