You'd need a lot of members brought in to cover even small increases in the marginal cost of TAG. So it could be a question of how much money is AGA willing to lose to have more members. I don't think anyone is considering that. sh --- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Depends on how many more members it brought in. > > Almost everyone not heavily invested in the AGA that I've > talked to says > that TAG is the only thing that the AGA offers them. > There are other fringe > and less tangible benefits, but TAG's about it as far as > they're concerned. > More often than not now it's just not giving them what > they want. > Increasing the size/some content of TAG would/should make > it a better value > for those folks. _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm