Re: [AGA-mcm] How much more TAG?

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

Our goal in AGA, at least so far, has always been to give back to the 
members, and NOT necessarily to grow financially.  So as far as I'm 
concerned, as long as we aren't LOSING money, that's all that matters.  It's 
even OK to lose SOME money for a couple of years, as long as we can turn it 
around. (something we certainly saw with our change to a color TAG)

Karen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
To: "AGA Advisory Committee" <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] How much more TAG?


> You'd need a lot of members brought in to cover even small
> increases in the marginal cost of TAG.
>
> So it could be a question of how much money is AGA willing
> to lose to have more members.
>
> I don't think anyone is considering that.
>
> sh
>
> --- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>Depends on how many more members it brought in.
> >
> > Almost everyone not heavily invested in the AGA that I've
> > talked to says
> > that TAG is the only thing that the AGA offers them.
> > There are other fringe
> > and less tangible benefits, but TAG's about it as far as
> > they're concerned.
> > More often than not now it's just not giving them what
> > they want.
> > Increasing the size/some content of TAG would/should make
> > it a better value
> > for those folks.
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm


_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm