It also occured to me that a proposal could present more than one option. When GWAPA did theirs (the draft versions anyhow) they had with and without Amano. So maybe that should be included too. sh --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@rightstuffwebsites.com> wrote: > That's fine with me. Maybe even indicate that it's ok > with us to not > have a convention this year, although Erik has repeatedly > made that clear. > > Cheryl > > S. Hieber wrote: > > I'd like to send the text below to the conhead list but > > it's pintless without some consensus. Comments? > > > > " > > I believe we had originally talked about Feb/March as > being > > the end of the line for consideration for 2005. It's > not a > > matter of desire but of practicality. > > > > Preproposal work is progressing thanks to some awfully > hard > > work by the SFBAAPS folks. Unfortunately, the calendar, > > too, is progressing and time has gotten dreadfully > short > > for planning. marketing and producing a convention. The > > fact that today more time is still needed to prepare a > > proposal is one indicator of how long the whole process > can > > take. Many of post-proposal tasks take even more time. > > > > So SFBAAPS should plan on a proposal being delivered to > the > > AGA by the end of this month at the latest if 2005 is > going > > to be the intended year. Otherwise, that means a target > of > > 2006, for which their is time to plan and produce > without > > folks burning out. > > > > sh" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AGA-mcm mailing list > > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm