Re: [AGA-mcm] alternate 2006 bids?

["S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>]

While I don't think we should try to play one club off of
another, I think some competition is good. I don't think we
should consider ourselves locked in until we have accepted
a proposal. It might be a good idea to post in a few places
again that we are entertaining proposals for 2006 and 2007
and give a deadline for each.

sh
--- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
> Just a quick observation of a few postings I've seen
> recently.
> 
> Though I think it's important to keep working with them
> towards a good 
> bid, I'm still not completely confident that SFBAAPS can
> pull off even the 
> 2006 bid yet.  I think we should be courting other clubs.
>  We definitely 
> shouldn't be taking any kind of approach that SFBAAPS is
> "locked in"... 
> and we shouldn't be posting anything to that effect on
> public forums at 
> this point, as that would give any other locals the idea
> that it's already 
> given to SFBAAPS.  I don't think this is like
> "two-timing".  If anything, 
> it will help insure a 2007 bid all the more.
> 
> Does this make sense?
> 
>    - Erik
> 
> -- 
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> 


_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm