Re: [AGA-mcm] alternate 2006 bids?

[Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>]

I agree completely. They have not even completed the
formal bid process. At this point I have seen nothing
from them that indicates to me that they have the
leadership and experience to pull off an AGA. In fact
the posts that I see from them (as recently as today)
have demonstrated a lack of understanding of some of
the most basic concepts of running a convention.

As far as I am concerned they are in the BID process
for 2006. Once they actually complete a formal bid it
should be considered against any other bid submitted.
Until then there is no agreement implied or otherwise.


Regards,
Larry
--- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
> Just a quick observation of a few postings I've seen
> recently.
> 
> Though I think it's important to keep working with
> them towards a good 
> bid, I'm still not completely confident that SFBAAPS
> can pull off even the 
> 2006 bid yet.  I think we should be courting other
> clubs.  We definitely 
> shouldn't be taking any kind of approach that
> SFBAAPS is "locked in"... 
> and we shouldn't be posting anything to that effect
> on public forums at 
> this point, as that would give any other locals the
> idea that it's already 
> given to SFBAAPS.  I don't think this is like
> "two-timing".  If anything, 
> it will help insure a 2007 bid all the more.
> 
> Does this make sense?
> 
>    - Erik
> 
> -- 
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> 
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm