SFBAAPS would get special consideration? By "special" you mean allowed a shorter time if they plan for an earlier-than-Nov or that only that club would be allowed a short lead time? I know of at least one other club that might want to propose a convention earlier than Nov 2005. sh --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > I would prefer this too. I thought there might be special > consideration > should SFBAAPS be interested in a spring/summer 2006 > event, but beyond > this I think it should be 1 year. > > - Erik > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Phil Edwards wrote: > > > I would like to see the floating deadline for the > proposal be in a full year > > before the anticipated convention date. > > > > Right now I'm getting geared up to start working on a > consortium of clubs, > > CAAS, CAPE, and the local NANFA chapter for a possible > bid at a conference in > > '07 or '08. > > > > Best, > > Phil > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AGA-mcm mailing list > > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > -- > Erik Olson > erik at thekrib dot com > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm