Re: [AGA-mcm] what to do about Kent?

[Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>]

I completely agree with Kathy. Bill them (Kent), we
already ran the ad and incurred our expense. I am not
saying we have to be anything but cordial, but I don't
think we should just walk away either. 

Larry

--- Kathy Olson <kathy@thekrib.com> wrote:

> I was thinking more like send them another
> bill....basically for 
> advertising done.   I don't know, what does everyone
> else think?
> 
> That is what I did with ecosystems, just kept
> billing them.  Then I 
> called, then they eventually paid.  Kent has the
> money, they should pay 
> for the ads done...
> 
> Okay, Milwaukee sounds like our mistake too, so I
> agree.
> 
> What does everyone thing?
> 
> K
> 
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, S. Hieber wrote:
> 
> > Milwaukee I let go since they said they had only
> asked for
> > 4 ads.
> >
> > You folks want I should lean on Kent. One of the
> cops at
> > work has a cousin down in that part of the
> country.
> >
> > sh
> >
> > --- Kathy Olson <kathy@thekrib.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I would re bill them....and if they don't pay
> then call,
> >> or Phil or I
> >> could call.  But definitely they should and will
> likely
> >> pay for what they
> >> have already advertised.
> >>
> >> Kathy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, S. Hieber wrote:
> >>
> >>> In reply to their bill for the ad placed in
> 18-2, Kent
> >>> replied that they are not advertising in TAG
> this year.
> >>> They sent that reply instead of a check.
> >>>
> >>> I'm thinking of changing over to pre-billing so
> we can
> >> pull
> >>> the ads of what in booking terms are technically
> >> referred
> >>> to as deadbeats. But that would mean billing at
> least a
> >>> month in advance of printing, since it sometimes
> takes
> >> the
> >>> advertisers that long to pay.
> >>>
> >>> Mr. Poole was kind enough to note that Kent
> "will be
> >> gong
> >>> over our new advertising budget in Jan. 2007.
> please
> >> [sic]
> >>> contact us then to see if here [sic] is a [sic]
> new
> >>> possinlbities [sic] then.
> >>>
> >>> I wonder if they meant 2006 instead of 2007. I
> wonder
> >> if
> >>> Poole will still be with the company in 2007. I
> wonder
> >> if
> >>> Taft-Hartley applies to aquatic hobbie
> manuyfacturers.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry folks. I've just been exposed to too much
> "bad
> >> form"
> >>> business acts this week from a number of diff
> places,
> >>> including at work. So, in defense of Kent, I
> would like
> >> to
> >>> point out that the letter *did not* come postage
> due.
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to say this is all just tongue in
> cheek, but
> >> I'm
> >>> biting down too hard on my tongue to get it into
> my
> >> cheek.
> >>>
> >>> sh
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> AGA-mcm mailing list
> >>> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> >>>
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AGA-mcm mailing list
> >> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-mcm mailing list
> > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> 

_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm