I guess I am on my own with this one but I feel compelled to state what my thoughts are on this. Although I usually am all for a corporate subsidy of a worthy project like this I am not sure that a corporate logo advertisement does not create the impression that we are in bed with said corporation as ana organization. Even with a company as well respected, and personally liked by most including myself, I have reservations. This is supposed to be a grass roots intro to planted tanks by the AGA. What will a new person reading this who is completely unfamiliar with us think if they see a corporate logo on our "educational" material. Perception is everything, I prefer logo/corporate free. I will go along with everyone else but I did feel like I needed to at least mention it. Regards, Larry --- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >I am rethinking asking Seachem for sponsorship. How > hard could it be to > >send Greg a link to the publication? After all, > their products are > >mentioned favorably, if not exclusively. Maybe we > would have to front the > >money for a bit, but we would probably do that > anyway. Does anyone object? > >Phil? > > I've got no problems asking the good Dr. for > assistance. > > > Best, > Phil > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm