I guess I am on my own with this one but I feel
compelled to state what my thoughts are on this.
Although I usually am all for a corporate subsidy of a
worthy project like this I am not sure that a
corporate logo advertisement does not create the
impression that we are in bed with said corporation as
ana organization. Even with a company as well
respected, and personally liked by most including
myself, I have reservations.
This is supposed to be a grass roots intro to planted
tanks by the AGA. What will a new person reading this
who is completely unfamiliar with us think if they see
a corporate logo on our "educational" material.
Perception is everything, I prefer logo/corporate
free.
I will go along with everyone else but I did feel like
I needed to at least mention it.
Regards,
Larry
--- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote:
I am rethinking asking Seachem for sponsorship. How
hard could it be to
send Greg a link to the publication? After all,
their products are
mentioned favorably, if not exclusively. Maybe we
would have to front the
money for a bit, but we would probably do that
anyway. Does anyone object?
Phil?
I've got no problems asking the good Dr. for
assistance.
Best,
Phil
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm