Hi Phil, Yes, I definitely see Seachem's relationships with all of the organizations as a good thing. I have a lot of respect for them as an organization. I just have mixed feelings about having any corporate logo on this project. That being said I am for doing this the way you discussed (PBS Stle) if everyone else is on board. Regards, Larry --- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote: > Larry, > > I agree with your sentiment and having been the one > to ask Seachem for all > sorts of stuff lately I'm acutely aware of how often > their logo comes up. I > also think about how Seachem sponsors DFWAPC's > website. DFWAPC, AGA, and > Seachem have a long history of partnership and I > don't see recognizing that > as a bad thing. A lot of the things we do with the > AGA are made available > more easily because of coporate contribution and > many people recognize > Seachem's involvement as a genuine desire to help > the hobby apart from plain > corporate interest. I don't feel that we need to > have a huge Logo somewhere > very visible as an advertisement as we're not asking > them to subsidize the > whole cost of the printing. As Erik said, a PBS > type "Printing of this > booklet was made possible in part by a generous > contribution from <insert > benefactor here>" recognizes the contribution in a > less obtrusive manner. > > Regards, > Phil > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm