[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-mcm] Potential AGAF staff
- To: AGA Advisory Committee <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] Potential AGAF staff
- From: Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 04:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0pRZ718ftSToIg0W9YXJf3zth2qDITtwV8tZ8OUl8lTQgzaaxra6C0YhYIijQxQ6+MUIt8wlP//T1Diwz3CbYI9/HNq0F0GDb+X7Rr7j0MYU7WRrE+800rRZT/ORFd5yucZUvM2cx2fL7g1GlyTyW3e5419NpuvriMcc2+AB2Y8= ;
I have known Cavan for a long time. We have traded
plants and met up a few times for trips to "The
Aquarium Center". I don't think he would be a problem
just because he is on APC and Aquabotanic.
If that is your only concern, I would be happy to call
him and discuss with him what we would like from our
"potential" moderators in our "possible" forum and see
what he says.
That being said, I agree that we don't need to many
moderators just enough.
Regards,
Larry
--- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I sent Ray an email letting him know the situation
> and what we're hoping to
> do. He has yet to reply, but I don't think he'll
> say now.
>
> Ben Belton is an awesome choice!
>
> Re: some of the names that came up earlier.
> Cavan Allen and Roger Miller are both good choices
> based on their knowledge
> and experience. Roger in particular is a good
> choice thanks to his
> personality and excellent writing skills. When
> asked previously if he
> wanted to staff on a different site he said that he
> only wanted to be on one
> site. He may change his mind for an AGA site, it
> wouldn't hurt to ask.
>
> I'm more than a little leery of Cavan though. Call
> me paranoid, but he's on
> staff with both Aquabotanic and Aquatic Plant
> Central. As petty as it may
> sound/be they're pretty competitive sites and I
> would be hesitant to give
> someone insight to the internal workings/politics of
> our forum that could be
> turned around on another site before we had a chance
> to impliment them.
>
> I think Diana should be given mod status because
> she's AGA staff and all AGA
> staff should have that status. Robert may be miffed
> at us "stealing" her
> but I don't see how we couldn't have an area for
> "Walstad Style" tanks on
> the site.
>
> I guess this is as good a time as any to bring up
> the topic of
> multi-staffing. How do we want to deal with folks
> who are staff on other
> sites, me included. Do we want to "steal" people or
> do we want to give new
> folks, or folks who are no longer staffing a site
> the opportunity at AGAF?
> I'm personally for not double-dipping. There seem
> to be fewer potential
> problems that way. Paul K. would seem to me to be
> an exception. From what
> I can tell he's at APC because they have a strong
> Crypt group and he pretty
> much stays to that and the physiology/emersed
> culture sub-forums.
>
> Overall, I think the moderators should be monitors
> and re-directors and not
> be expected to maintain activity on the site. If
> 75% of our membership
> visits we'll have plenty of expertise and lively
> discussion without having
> to resort to relying on moderators to keep things
> moving. Paula would be a
> great choice.
>
> I guess that gets to the point of how many
> moderators do we need/want and
> what traits do we want the mods to have? The
> answer? As my organic chem
> professor said when asked how many of something to
> add in a reaction... "as
> many as are needed". If all of us had mod rights
> and then we added four or
> five others that should be enough for the whole
> group to cover the site. We
> shouldn't be making people mods just because they
> have a lot of aquarium
> experience and we want them on the site. If they
> want to talk tanks they'll
> be there regardless. I didn't get a chance to see
> them in action in The
> Day, but George and Karla are a perfect example. If
> they did a good job of
> keeping the peace maintaining a discussion on APD
> and will stick to their
> duties over time then YES they're great choices. If
> not, then they can
> contribute best as the experienced aquarists that
> they are.
>
> That's all until something else comes up.
>
> Botanically yours,
> Phil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm