Maybe I have the name wrong but the guy that owns ZooMed. I've been mailing bills, marked to his attention, but without reply. Maybe you can get a current addres from them if you have a contact? or maybe Larry can from his contact. I menat to do this at ACA, but somehow I could cross paths with the guy. sh --- Phil Edwards <biotypical@hotmail.com> wrote: > Who's Bagnal? > > > >And to get Bagnal to pay. Phil do you have an address > for > >him? > > > >sh > >--- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes, great job as always on the report. I agree with > > > Erik and your conclusions about this year. > > > > > > As Scott noted, I think we need to be particularly > > > aware of the perception that we are losing momentum > > > without an AGA this year. > > > > > > I believe we can counteract some of this negative > > > momentum with a strong forum introduction and > whatever > > > we are going to call this "NON-AGA" thing....if it > > > does work out. > > > > > > The lost revenues, associated with lost TAG > > > Adverstisers, no AGA and no DVD may be a harder > > > problem to solve. > > > > > > The latter two are beyond our control the former is > > > probably where we need to focus. Phil is already > > > working on it but we all need to try to think of ways > > > to help him out. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > --- "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I don't care, I'm including it as an attachment > > > > anyway, > > > > > so it stays in the > > > > > archive. Half a meg is nothing these days. :) > > > > > > > > I usually do both, not so much for the server as > for > > > > the > > > > convenience of the awaiting fans of things > financial > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice summary, Scott. > > > > > > > > Thanks, we all made the numbers; I just wrote them > > > > down. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that just as the book revenue was > > > > artificially high > > > > > the last half > > > > > of 2004, > > > > > > > > Yes, artificially high book revs in 2004 because of > > > > the > > > > Amano Rio Negro book but there was an unusaully > high > > > > book > > > > expense for the same which totally offset the revs. > > > > > > > > > the DVD revenue is unusually high for the first > > > > > half of this year > > > > > because of the 2004 convention disk, > > > > > > > > I don't call that artificial; I call that a damn > > > > good > > > > product. > > > > > > > > > and to a lesser > > > > > extent, the TAG > > > > > archive. > > > > > > > > Another great and popular product. > > > > > > > > > I do not expect these to continue at these > > > > > levels, especially as > > > > > we have no convention this year. So I suspect > the > > > > next > > > > > 12 months will be > > > > > financially tough. > > > > > > > > Yes. I think yours is a good insight. Actually, a > > > > large > > > > portion of AGA2K4 revs did not arrive until January > > > > 2005 > > > > but I had accrued those in 2004 (not strictly > kosher > > > > with > > > > cash basis accounting) to give a better picture of > > > > AGA2K4 > > > > results in the 2004 report. So, likewise I *didn't* > > > > count > > > > them again in the 1st 6 months of 2005. But there > is > > > > a > > > > couple of grand more in the bank that the current > > > > report > > > > might lead one to believe. > > > > > > > > With no convention this year, we might lose some > > > > market > > > > steam, which could cost us more than just foregoing > > > > some > > > > DVD revenues. We shall see. But significant things > > > > to think > > > > about for the 2005 outlook are lowered DVD revs, no > > > > convention rev this year, lower TAG ad revs, and > > > > possibly, > > > > a depression in new memberships due to the first > > > > two. This > > > > could put our revenue stream for the 2nd 6 months > > > > closer to > > > > what I think it was several years ago. However, > > > > convention > > > > and DVDs aside, I don't think our membership level > > > > is > > > > moving a lot one way or the other, so that might be > > > > a > > > > stability factor in terms of business activity, and > > > > a very > > > > large core one at that. > > > > > > > > Also, depending on the occurence and the timing, we > > > > might > > > > see some offsetting boost in AGA awareness due to > > > > forums. > > > > Although, I am aware that there is a > counterargument > > > > that > > > > forums might dissuade some folks from full fledged > > > > membership. > > > > > > > > An interesting time to be involved in AGA. > > > > > > > > Get real, get plants, > > > > sh > > > > > > > > Share the fun; show your work. > > > > The AGA's Sixth Annual International Aquascaping > > > > Contest is open. > > > > > > > > Find about about here: > > > > http://showcase.aquatic-gardeners.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > AGA-mcm mailing list > > > > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > > > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > AGA-mcm mailing list > > > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >AGA-mcm mailing list > >AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > >http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm