Scott wrote:
I think that ACA read the court better than the court read the law. Venue and medium are what selling copies (and thus copyright) is all about. Hard to make sense of what the court decided here, since it sounds like the NG didn't just release in a new format but actually reworked the material and released in a new format. You might call it an Axelrodic interpretation.
Didn't sound that way to me... It said they actually photocopied two pages, side-by side and used it that way, without reformatting. From what the article said, the only change was some intro material on the disk, and some included software, which I'm guessing, allowed easier viewing of the pages.
Karen
_______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm