I'm culpable on this one too... I should have checked with you. But She called me in the afternoon, and needed photos by the next day. (She had tried to get photos from the ADA contest, was having culture barrier problems there, and I thought it was WAY better for us if she used pix from OUR contest.<g> I sent her to Cheryl. Karen -----Original Message----- From: aga-mcm-bounces@thekrib.com [mailto:aga-mcm-bounces@thekrib.com] On Behalf Of Erik Olson Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:27 PM To: AGA Advisory Committee Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] article about aquascaping mentions AGA, thanks Karen On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Cheryl Rogers wrote: > Oooops. I didn't know that, my bad. I thought that as long as they were > used to advertise the AGA & AGA contest, and their name and details were > listed on the page, that it was okay. I can have them change it if you > think it matters. I'm sure it wouldn't be a problems for them to burn in > the name like we did. This is the exact language in the release form we send and gets signed by every entrant: 'In all cases of publication of images submitted to the AGA International Aquascaping Contest, the notice "C2009 [name of copyright owner]" will be given.' So the times is not required to do a burn-in (especially since they have such tiny images). But they are theoretically supposed to have that copyright notice somewhere. What they're doing is VERY CLOSE, probably close enough, as *we* don't even say "(C) 2009" on our own publications... but we do list the photographer, which may not be the case with the LA Times Gallery. I didn't bother to check if any of the 20 or so photos had different photographers than entrants. - Erik -- Erik Olson Sent from my crusty old Linux box erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm