Yeah those camra posts smelled of spam to me too. I think it is better to delete and leave good content when in doubt. If the poster is really looking for info they will likely assume there was a problem and repost a similar question. Just my two cents.... Larry --- On Mon, 1/18/10, Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote: > From: Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> > Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] Update on things forum... > To: "'AGA Advisory Committee'" <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> > Date: Monday, January 18, 2010, 3:16 PM > > > -----Original Message----- > > >>It's very subtle. As an admin, I'm being > pretty brutal on anyone who > shows up to the forum (possibly registering right before > posting), leaves > an essentially pointless post on an existing topic > (especially an old one) > that has a link to an unrelated business in their > signature. If the reply > looks legit but moronic, like actually mentions aquatic > plants, I go into > their profile and remove the signature. I suppose if > any of those > actually came back and complained, I would let them put the > signature > back. But they don't come back.<< > > I think that's a good policy. I actually was pretty > sure all the camera > posts were someone phishing. Yes, we've certainly had > people asking about > cameras, but they seemed to have no interest in cameras > that could take good > aquarium shots, and didn't reply directly to any of the > good advice they > received. > > Karen > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-mcm mailing list > AGA-mcm@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm > _______________________________________________ AGA-mcm mailing list AGA-mcm@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm