--- ROlesen104@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 12/29/03 4:31:24 PM Eastern Standard > Time, > shieber@yahoo.com (Scott) writes: > >> > This would probably true about hair, red and all the > other obnoxious, > attached algae provided those algae don't release spores > into the water column to > reproduce themselves. If spores are released into the > water, and to the extent > that this water is somehow run through the UV before the > spores can attach > themselves to something, will they not be adversely > affected by a trip through the > UV rays? I think it must cut down at least some on their > spread. In theory yes, but there's scant evidence that the impact is significant that way. A water change probalby works as well for that one particular effect. > . . . > I'm no electrician of lighting expert, but I think > turning a bulb on and off > shortens its life as much or more than it being > constantly on all the time? Depends ho often you turn it off and on. If you use the UV once a week for say 24 hours straight, the bulb will last longer than burning 24/7. If you cycle the bulb every 6 hours, you'd probably be closer to breakeven. Regular fluoresecents life ratings are based on 3 hour cycles -- continuously running last longer than cycled bulbs inthat case -- but I don't know about UV bulbs. The assumption might be that in most uses, they are run continuously and the rated life is based on that. Anyone look this up recently? I've only been looking at some Philips bulbs and they rate those based on 8 hour cycles. Much less than regular fluoresents. Scott H. ===== S. Hieber __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, please send mail to majordomo@thekrib.com with "Unsubscribe aga-member" in the body of the message. Archives of this list can be found at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-member/