Gosh, yeah, I'd second Karen's opinion there. Though he was fairly polite to me at the NJAS convention, his ethics are REALLY obnoxious. He already spammed about the 2001 ACA convention. Almost two years away, for goodness sake! And I called him on it; noted that his tactics are going to backfire and tick a lot of folks off (I noticed Norwalk AS was adopting a similar "strafing" e-mail policy for their convention which is still a year away). His reply was a snide "heh heh, I've created a monster, haven't I". - Erik (who just found the TAG in our monsterous pile of mail...off to add the latest TOC to the website.) On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Neil Frank wrote: > Take 2: > Forgot about Ted..... if Jack agrees, I suggest that AGA have publicity (in > addition to the web page and APD) and that we find someone to handle > (chair) that activity. I only mentioned Ted bc someone from his club > recommended him. If someone else has a name, please mention it. > --Neil > > At 08:25 PM 12/03/1999 -0500, you wrote: > >At 08:59 AM 12/4/99 -0500, Neil wrote: > > > >>At the NJ annual aquarium meeting, someone from that club > >>recommended Ted Coletti to help AGA with advertising. He can be annoying, > >>but is agressive. Bob or someone else might want to approach him. > > > >Neil, I can work with just about anybody. But _not_ Ted Colletti. If you > >are planning on getting him involved with AGA in any way, please also plan > >on keeping him (far) away from me. He has been out and out cruel to me in > >the past, and I will not expose myself to the risk of that sort of > >treatment again. He is a _lot_ worse than annoying. If you folks think > >Dave G can be hard to get along with, you have _absolutely_ no idea. > > > >Karen > > > > > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com