Hi, On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 22:42:37 -0500 krandall@world.std.com writes: >Bob, I do _not_ want you to think I am picking on you here, but we really >need to make some decisions regarding the purpose, role and authority >of the SC versus the MC. The way the AGA management committee was >originally envisioned, it was not a decision making body, but more of an advisory >body, made up of various committee heads. It is only within the last few >months that the MC has been given the right to vote on any AGA >decisions. I am glad you finally told me because I've been puzzling over this since the first vote on PAM. When I announced the unanimous decision, not only did several of the MC jump on me but Karen said something to the effect that she didn't realize the vote request message had gone only to the SC. I implied that meant I should have had the entire MC voting so thats what I did. Now you see why I have been pushing to get our structure and jobs describes, I assumed that everything was still flexible because in my mind it was. Bob ___________________________________________________________________ Why pay more to get Web access? Try Juno for FREE -- then it's just $9.95/month if you act NOW! Get your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.