[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: Fw: SC & MC



Hi Folks --
It seems to me that we should neither penalize nor es[ecially help someone
who is in the upper echelons of AGA when they have a book they wish to sell.
If it meets the standards of whoever sets those standards in terms of what
we offer for sale, we should sell the book. From what I have heard, Diana's
book meets our standards, and therefore I can see no reason why we should
not sell it.
Hope this helps.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert P. Cashin <rcashin@juno.com>
To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: SC & MC


> Hi All,
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 13:22:31 -0500 krandall@world.std.com writes:
> >At 09:03 AM 12/21/99 -0500, Robert P. Cashin wrote:
>
> >Bob,  I _really_ think that some of your E-mail is still going astray,
> >and
> >that may be the root of some misunderstandings and miscommunications.
>
> I don't think it is missing email, but rather missing the point. More
> than once I've seen others fail to respond to requests that were in
> larger documents because of this and it is why I am so adamant about
> editing out everything that is not pertinent.
>
>
> >BTW, I want to state again that I am not entirely convinced that this
> >is
> >the way we _should_ be doing things, just that it is the way things
> >were
> >originally set up.  At the time Neil and I worked this up, there were
> >only
> >4 people on the SC, and the MC was an imaginary body.  We didn't know
> >who
> >would be on it, or how they would interact.  It may very well be time
> >to
> >take a good hard look at how we are operating, and see if something
> >else
> >might not work better.  Please don't think that just because I'm
> >telling
> >you how things were set up means that I feel strongly that they have
> >to
> >stay that way.
>
> I don't have any problem with your explanation of the SC and MC duties .
> My vision of the AGA chair and yours, however,  are somewhat different. I
> consider the position like an orchestra's conductor. He sets the tempo
> and keeps the rest of the group together for the common goal. I really
> want the inputs, even if in the end, I decide to disagree with some. I
> feel this is particularly true now because we are feeling our way to
> another level of existence. We are moving from an oligarchy to a
> democracy and the transition can be expected to be bumpy at times.
>
> David, Dorothy and Erik, I would like your inputs on the Diana book
> situation. We have two opinions so far and they are diametrically
> opposed. When you have stated your opinions, we can decide if any of us
> want to change our positions because of the thoughts expressed by the
> rest of the SC.
>
> Shortly, I'll be putting together a Chairs message for the next issue.
> I'll run it by you all to see if I've missed anything of significance
> when it is done.
>
> Happy Holidays, Bob C
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
> Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
> Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>