Mary, Regarding you request for advice in your Mar 2 message to me: > Incidentally, the article in PAM is exactly the one I was going to publish > in the next issue of TAG. I suppose I can't very well publish it now, > right? I'm pissed. I have to apologize, but it completely completely slipped by me. Sorry. Regarding your other publishing ideas below, all very reasonable and I will support you on this to the board. >since Claus' and Ole's >article is a ground-breaking scientific study I am going to go ahead and >publish it and will also publish other scientific type articles they send me >in the future. [I agree] But in terms of your every day article, I am not going to >duplicate the very same article from another publication unless (a) it is >directed toward a very different audience or (b) a year or more has elapsed >which would make it a reprint. [OK] >I wish you had not waited so long to give me your feedback. Had I known how >you felt, I probably would have responded differently. I am not sure I had a firm opinion on Mar 2. It was not until I received more information (not from you, but from the SC), and heard their opinions - then I had formed my opinion which I gave you on the 7th. Is my math correct: 7-2 = 5 days later? >From now on, whenever there is a big decision to be made, I am going to take >my concerns directly to the SC so as to avoid any future problems. [Good] ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".