Re: German tranlator for TAG; APD #871

[Neil Frank <nfrank@mindspring.com>]

I did the responsible thing, and apologized for "overlooking" her request
for help. At some point, when I don't think I will blow up, I will tell her
about communication and patience. In the meanwhile, I want to bring your
attention to her message below which I exerpt her:

>>Thank you.  Karen seemed to think my ideas were reasonable, too.  The other
>>members of the SC received copies of my letter to you, but I haven't
>>received a response.  Would you please make sure someone gets back to me?
>>
Erik... I think the ball is in your court.  Neil

=====================================================
>From: "Mary McCaw" <marymccaw@mediaone.net>
>To: "Neil Frank" <nfrank@mindspring.com>
>Subject: Re: German tranlator for TAG; APD #871
>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:35:58 -0500
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Neil Frank" <nfrank@mindspring.com>
>To: "Mary McCaw" <marymccaw@mediaone.net>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:43 PM
>Subject: Re: German tranlator for TAG; APD #871
>
>
>> Mary,
>> Regarding you request for advice in your Mar 2 message to me:
>>
>>    > Incidentally, the article in PAM is exactly the one I was going to
>> publish
>>    > in the next issue of TAG.  I suppose I can't very well publish it
>now,
>>    > right?  I'm pissed.
>>
>> I have to apologize, but it completely completely slipped by me. Sorry.
>
>I accept your apology.
>
>> Regarding your other publishing ideas below, all very reasonable and I
>will
>> support you on this to the board.
>
>Thank you.  Karen seemed to think my ideas were reasonable, too.  The other
>members of the SC received copies of my letter to you, but I haven't
>received a response.  Would you please make sure someone gets back to me?
>
>Mary
>>
>> >since Claus' and Ole's
>> >article is a ground-breaking scientific study I am going to go ahead and
>> >publish it and will also publish other scientific type articles they send
>me
>> >in the future.  [I agree]
>>
>> But in terms of your every day article, I am not going to
>> >duplicate the very same article from another publication unless (a) it is
>> >directed toward a very different audience or (b) a year or more has
>elapsed
>> >which would make it a reprint. [OK]
>>
>> >I wish you had not waited so long to give me your feedback.  Had I known
>how
>> >you  felt, I probably would have responded differently.
>>
>> I am not sure I had a firm opinion on Mar 2. It was not until I received
>> more information (not from you, but from the SC), and heard their opinions
>> - then I had formed my opinion which I gave you on the 7th. Is my math
>> correct: 7-2 = 5 days later?
>>
>> >From now on, whenever there is a big decision to be made, I am going to
>take
>> >my concerns directly to the SC so as to avoid any future problems. [Good]
>
>
  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".