Dorothy, As the person that designed the current format for TAG, I suggest that we see if Dave will allow us to have 2 pages in PAM for AGA communications, but to not PERMANENTLY give up on the idea of having our own publication. Now that PAM is firmly established, if AGA wants a publication it should be something different to meet our needs. We dont necessarily know that that is, but I think TAG as it currently exists has outlived its usefulness for the AGA. Maybe a newsletter, maybe web based; maybe the mailing list; maybe ???? I suggest that we try to form a partnership with PAM (as Erik suggests), and at the same time to keep our options open for a new editor who has the skills _and_ vision for an alternative publication. We dont have to rush into creating a replacement for TAG. It could be 1 yr, 2 yrs or never. Lets let our needs guide us there. Neil At 11:38 PM 07/29/2001 -0400, you wrote: >I would really hate to see us lose TAG. About a year or so ago I suggested >we look for another Editor as we could see trouble then. Nothing came of it. >I would still like to see some one else take over. I don't like the idea of >substituting PAM for our great magazine! Our format is so much better. > Yes, I agree that we should go ahead and hire another lawyer to get our >by-laws up and running. > >Dorothy >- > > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy". > > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".