Re: AGA stance on the defense fund. (fwd)

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

More feedback

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:22:20 -0600
From: Roger S. Miller <rgrmill@rt66.com>
Reply-To: aquatic-plants@actwin.com
Subject: Re: AGA stance on the defense fund.

Erik Olson wrote:

> The AGA steering committee deliberated over whether to
> take an official stance on this about a month ago. Irregardless of how we
> feel as individuals in the case, it was decided that it would be
> inappropriate for the AGA as an organization to take an official stance on
> this issue.


Thanks for the news, Erik

It think it's like Eldridge Cleaver said so long ago.  You're either
part of the problem or you're part of the solution.  I guess we know
where AGA is.
 
> Thus, the article in _The Aquatic Gardener_ will be informational
> reporting, there is no link to the defense (or Pets Warehouse, for that
> matter) on our website, and most likely we could not have any official
> activities at the convention.

Yeah.  Just ignore the problem and it will go away.


Roger Miller

------------------------------

  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".