Please refresh my memory -- whatwas our official "position" other than the fact that we did not want to get involved in any unnecessary law suits. Please help me out. Thanks. David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com> To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: Re: Pets Warehouse Suit: AGA Position (fwd) > Feedback > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:23:41 -0600 > From: Chuck Gadd <cgadd@cfxc.com> > Reply-To: aquatic-plants@actwin.com > Subject: Re: Pets Warehouse Suit: AGA Position > > > Subject: Pets Warehouse Suit: AGA Position > > feel as individuals in the case, it was decided that it would be > > inappropriate for the AGA as an organization to take an official stance on > > this issue. > > I am very dissapointed by this. The stated purpose of the AGA is > "to disseminate information about aquatic plants." In this case, people > (some of them AGA members?) were disseminating information about places > to purchase (or not purchase) aquatic plants. And now they are being > sued as a result. > > Seems like an appropriate thing to take a stand on. > > - -- > Chuck Gadd > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy". > > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "showy".