Forums are okay. I don't mind using them, but I forget to go back and check them. Then if I have something to say, well it's too late because it's been three weeks and now I'm lame-o.
About half of us know that DFWAPC has started their own forum for members only. It's slow to start, but we'll see. People like being able to post pictures, I think.
I figure what the heck. If it lights, it lights. If not, what have we lost?
Cheryl Karen Randall wrote:
That thought crossed my mind too. OTOH, how many members would we have to gain to make it worthwhile? Is it worth giving it a try, considering that we KNOW we really NEED to increase our membership base? What if we did something like leave it open to everyone for the first year, and THEN close off an area that is just for members? that might give people an added incentive to join. And while I'm thinking about it, maybe some of us more experienced people (and that DEFINITELY includes you, Scott ;-) would be willing to moderate or be "guest experts" in sections specifically because it IS a way to help the AGA grow? I'd be willing to do that. If a group of people each took one section, it reallywouldn't be very much work. I bet Luis or Ghazanfar would love to run the aquascaping section, for instance. We could ask George if he'd be willing to run a "high tech" area, at least for a while. I think he's warming up to the AGA again, and we might as well strike while the iron is hot.<g> I don't care for forums personally as a rule, but they ARE popular with many people, and are easier to use then a mailing list for the uninitiated... and probably for those who are newer to the internet than some of us. This might also be a really good way of finding some more people who are interested in being "worker bees" for the AGA, but don't want to get in too deep right away. I don't know. Maybe because it's a new day, but I feel more positive toward this today than I did yesterday. You can all tell me to get back in bed if you want, but I haven't even taken any drugs today!<g> Karen----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 6:34 AM Subject: Re: AGA Forums (fwd) One forum for all and all for, um, one?Another thought. If the AGA masthead would be such a draw, then why isn't the AGA mailist bigger and busier? I'm not complaining, just espressing further doubt about the power of the name. sh ===== S. Hieber __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".
-- Cheryl Rogers, Membership Aquatic Gardeners Association http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".