I actually liked the last paragraph, because if she is NOT an AGA member, it wouldn't be an appropriate place for it anyways. I think sometimes they do honor member, like the GUY JORDAN fund in the ACA, but those are REALLY INCREDIBLE people. just my 2 cents worth. Kathy On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Erik Olson wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, S. Hieber wrote: > > > I still like stating the practical difficulty of chosing > > any one person to honor, given that we couldn't do prizes > > for them all or even many. It suggests that we are not > > rejecting Vicki in particular but rejecting singling out > > everyone. > > This is what I implicitly tried to state in the first paragraph, because I > thought if I explicitly stated anything then it would get read as > either, "Hey, there's too many people who've died -- to be fair, we should > just honor NONE of them instead of one of them." ... or alternatively ... > "Hey, lots of people have died, but there's more important ones to honor." > Both of these statements really suck, and are really NOT appropriate to > say. Remember the circus that ensued on one of the lists where someone > first suggested a moment of silence... and it rapidly grew into a whole > "obit" section for the convention (not unlike what has happened this week > here), and then someone else suggested we should then do nothing for > anyone, and yet another person came down like a ton of bricks on that > thought for being beaurocratic and inhumane. > > I much preferred to leave that aspect ambiguous and just note that we've > had good friends die too & let them draw their own conclusions. > > So you're probably right -- I will take out the last paragraph or at least > mutate it. > > - Erik > > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".