They basically risked or gave up $1000 in profits in exchange for AGA taking the bottom line risks. And this was because they didn't have any assets to cover bottom line risks. GWAPA has at least a few grand. Maybe more than AGA ;-) sh --- Kathy Olson <kathy@thekrib.com> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, S. Hieber wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think if it is mailed in TAG it should come out of > AGA > > > funds. > > > > > > You mean the basic postage for mailing TAG, not the > > incremental increase if any, right? > > Actually I thought that Karen may mean both, which I was > okay with, but in > reality it would be good to ad any incremental increase > to the convention > budget. I think it is good to keep them separate. > > > > > > > Which reminds me, I haven't seen any proposals on how > > > revenue will be > > > distributed. Ie..the first 1000-2000 to AGA (like > what > > > Dallas did) and > > > then split all over that? What is their > expectations!! > > > > You're right. I didn't notice that. I think they're > looking > > at 50-50 down the line. They have assets! But I better > > double check. > > > > Yeah, I thought what Dallas did was great since the AGA > carried all the > risk. > > Kathy > > > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail > majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at > http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and > password "incorp". > ===== S. Hieber __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".