On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, S. Hieber wrote: > > > > > > > I think if it is mailed in TAG it should come out of AGA > > funds. > > > You mean the basic postage for mailing TAG, not the > incremental increase if any, right? Actually I thought that Karen may mean both, which I was okay with, but in reality it would be good to ad any incremental increase to the convention budget. I think it is good to keep them separate. > > > > Which reminds me, I haven't seen any proposals on how > > revenue will be > > distributed. Ie..the first 1000-2000 to AGA (like what > > Dallas did) and > > then split all over that? What is their expectations!! > > You're right. I didn't notice that. I think they're looking > at 50-50 down the line. They have assets! But I better > double check. > Yeah, I thought what Dallas did was great since the AGA carried all the risk. Kathy ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".