Erik Olson wrote:
As for #1, I think this is a mistake. I've talked to people about this, and pretty much everyone has said it is inappropriate for the convention to be used to prop up TAG. TAG must stand on its own.
All due respect, I don't think that's what David meant. I think he was just using the cost of one TAG as a metaphor for annual convention income, and saying that we shouldn't set our expectations too LOW. David, if this *is not* what you meant, then we are both wrong! :-)
-- Cheryl Rogers, Membership Aquatic Gardeners Association http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".