Re: [AGA SC] Re: GWAPA Proposal -- AGA2K4 -- 1-4-2004 (fwd)

[Kathy Olson <kathy@thekrib.com>]

Hi
I think it was 49, that is what I voted on.  You are right though I did 
bring up the Dallas thing.  I thought since hotel was more expensive, and 
since the difference to break even between reg at 49 and 59 was like 5 
people, the 49 would attract more people.

I know as a med student, I went to ACA and paid the reg fee and then 
stayed at hotels away from the conference to save money.  Of course after 
staying up until 3 am talking and then driving to the other hotels, which 
were 30 min away, I always shared a room there after that.

Kathy



On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Cheryl Rogers wrote:

> Umm. Go ahead and tell me to shut up. But wasn't Scott's motion for 
> $59 because 59 + 40 = 99?
> 
> Doesn't matter to me. Whatever.
> 
> Cheryl
> 
> Kathy Olson wrote:
> 
> > I don't think you got answers on the $49 thing.
> > 
> 
> 

  ------------------
  To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
  with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
  Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
  When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".