Some paid for multiyear and the least paid is $20, right? so the method needs tuning. Membership revenues in a period don't have a lot to do with the size of membership but with the gross increase in membership (the gross decrease notwithstanding). Is there no record of the purchases in the paypal stuff or Cheryl's records either? Backing into the raw data stuff is tough. It would be much better to record the raw data as it's created. Then reporting is just summing an analyzing -- and then guesswork and ersatz numbers are limited to planning, to the budget. If we could have raw data about the future, that would be nice too, but I hear from all but the best physicists that it's not possible. sh --- David Lass <davidlass@villasunscape.com> wrote: > Hi All -- > Sitting here trying to keep warm (Boston broke the > all-time record for coldest measured temp last nite @-3 > degrees F) I've been working on the 2004 budget, as well > as the 2003 financial report. To get the membership > revenue I took last year's membership revenue of $12,158 > and divided it by 800 members, since that seems to be the > average number of TAGs that went out. That is $15.20 > revenue per member per year. At 850 members that is a > member revenue of $12,918. > Does this method and number make sense to you guys? > David > > > David Lass > Northeast Field Manager > NexPet -- A Group for Independent Pet Retailers > 781.581.1788 > davidlass@villasunscape.com > ===== S. Hieber __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".