Even if WE all already know what the answer is, I think we owe them an
"official" motion and vote. So I move that we accept The GW(whatever...I
have trouble with all those letters) proposal to host the 2004 AGA
conference, with details still to be worked out with the help of the AGA
Conference Liaison.
Karen
----- Original Message -----
From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:44 PM
Subject: [AGA SC] Convention Notice in TAG -- Word to GWAPA
Great news about the hotel from ghazanfar. Rick was right
that they are willing to work with us.
I think we should go with the notice in TAG as discussed
-- and I tell them what we're going to say in it. That
ought to be official enough, eh?
Or do we need a motion and a vote?
sh
=====
S. Hieber
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".
------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".