I'm concerned enough that I think we only consider Sheraton if we can't find a better deal in time -- and *then*, yes, I'd want an attorney. I also don't want to tell them they are rejected. I see no obligation on our part now to burn any bridges at all for any reason. I know Force Majeure is implicit in every contract under the law in most states. But we always stick it in our contracts anyhow. I actually inserted a Force Majeure clause in the prior version just to make it clear that the protection applied to both parties and *not just* the hotel. This particular sentence says that their obligations to perform aren't affected by, for example, "acts of God"? Thus, if a meteor hits the hotel, they obligation is unaffected and they still have to perform! I doubt I could hold them to it. ;-) It's goofy enough one could read it to mean they are on the hook, off the hook, maybe even stradling the hook. sh --- David Lass <davidlass@villasunscape.com> wrote: > This clause below is a pretty standard > force majeure" clause that's in a lot of contracts. > > > > They have added very odd language: "The Hotel's > obligation > > to perform will not be subject to events beyond its > > reasonable control (such as strikes, governmental > controls, > > or Acts of God)." Anyone know what that means? It is > either > > a declaration of omnipotence on the Hotel's part or, > more > > likely, meant as a disclaimer. > > > > > Are we, in fact, concerned enough that we maybe should > run it by an > attorney??? > David > ===== S. Hieber - - - - - - - - Amano Returns to the AGA Annual Convention Nov 2004 -- Baltimore __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".