Thanks for the progress report Scott. So glad you're keeping tabs and not me right now... I'd be failing miserably. - Erik On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, S. Hieber wrote: > No news really but this is what has happened. The Sheraton > ws supposed to place a conference call to Rick, Larry and > me. For some reason they couldn't do that (a hotel can't > set u a conference call?) so we had Larry take the call. > Larry and I spoke for about an hor before the call to > discuss what we needed to insist on. Our main tack was to > say that we'd accept a sliding scale on the meeting rooms > (sliding scale based on room nights) but not guaranteeing > any rooms. This way, whatever they want to cover their risk > will be in one figure for one item, i.e., the meeting > rooms. IF that number is acceptable to us, then we can > negotiate, if not, then we'll carry on with other hotels an > stop wasting time. > > How the call went. Larry explained our position and the > hotel rep seemed very amenable, same as last time, but of > course she can't actually agree to anything onthe holtel's > behalf, so we'll see what they come back with to know if > there's any point in continuing negotiations with them. And > that's basically how Larry put it to them -- the basic > structure of the deal they are offering is flat out > unacceptable. > > Point: we won't guarantee anything that we have no control > over, such as, for example, the number of roomnights that > get sold. > > Point: We want to be able to bring in food and beverage to > a private room for a hospitality room. She said that might > be okay if the items are sealed packages -- there's no > health code issues there if the food is commerically > packaged. Health code compliance was their "reason" in the > last proposal for why we couldn't bring in our own food and > beverage. Larry did not say we would be willing to buy the > stuff from the hotel (although we would if the price was > reasonable) because to do so would have been to essentially > admit we'd give in on bringing in our own stuff and we're > not ready to give that up. > > > Point: We also said we had to have a better schedule on the > cancellation terms. He explained that AGA is non profit and > a big rich corporation. I know that most folks think > cancellation is not likely or impossible, stuff happens -- > what if Amano is sick, blah blah. The potential liability > has to be less than would bankrupt both organizations, AGA > and GWAPA. Also, requiring payments 9 months before the > event was unreasonable. > > He also asked what she knew about AGA and he explained that > we're not rich, that we make no profit. > > Point: Force Majeure -- this has to be a two way street. > > She's supposed to get back to us with another proposal -- > he asked her to have it typed up in MS Word so that we > could track changes. > > That's about it. > > I think Larry is also going to try to talk to his contact > at the Dallas Marriot to see if they can talk to the people > at the Crystal Gateway Marriot. > > Btw, Rick expects proposals or draft contracts from the > Marriot Crystal Gateway and two other hotels that he's been > talking to and that Ghazanfar and he have visited. > > sh > > ===== > S. Hieber > > - - - - - - - - > Amano Returns > to the AGA Annual Convention > Nov 2004 -- Baltimore > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".